Marketing Ops Agent vs. Clay vs. Manual Enrichment: Which Approach is Right for You?

taMarketing operations teams face a fundamental question: how do you build accurate, enriched lists of ideal customers fast enough to hit revenue goals? Manual enrichment in ZoomInfo or Apollo eats hours. Clay workflows offer flexibility but demand technical expertise and constant maintenance. And AI agents promise full automation - but do they actually deliver?

The stakes are real. Companies that identify and enrich buying committees 10x faster see 40% higher pipeline conversion rates. But picking the wrong enrichment approach wastes budget, burns team bandwidth, and leaves revenue on the table.

This guide walks you through the evolution of list-building- from manual point-and-click enrichment to sophisticated Clay workflows to AI-powered Marketing Ops Agents - so you can choose what fits your team's size, sophistication, and growth goals.

Quick Answer: Best Enrichment Approach by Situation

Best for teams without technical resources: Marketing Ops Agent (zero workflow maintenance, prompt-based setup)

Best for extreme customization needs: Clay (chain 5+ data providers with conditional logic)

Best for low-volume, high-touch ABM: Manual enrichment (deep research per account)

Best for high-volume enrichment (1,000+ accounts/month): Marketing Ops Agent (AI scales infinitely)

Best for cost-conscious teams with engineering support: Clay (pay-as-you-go model)

Best for one-click CRM sync without middleware: Marketing Ops Agent (native HubSpot/Salesforce integration)

The Evolution: Manual to Spreadsheet to Agent

The Manual Enrichment Era (2015-2020)

How it works:

Export accounts from your CRM or prospecting tool
Open ZoomInfo, Apollo, or LinkedIn Sales Navigator
Manually search each company
Click through to find decision-makers by title
Copy-paste names, emails, LinkedIn URLs into a spreadsheet
Upload back to CRM or sequencing platform

Time investment: 2-4 hours per 100 contacts
Accuracy: 60-75% (frequent job changes, outdated data, human error)
Scalability: Limited by rep bandwidth

When it still makes sense:

Very small teams (1-2 BDRs) with low volume needs
Highly targeted ABM where every account requires deep research
Industries with limited data coverage in enrichment tools

"We were spending 15 hours a week just building lists in ZoomInfo. Our reps hated it, and by the time we uploaded the data, half the contacts had already changed jobs." - Head of Sales Operations, SaaS company

The Clay Revolution (2020-2024)

Clay brought workflow automation to enrichment by letting teams chain multiple data providers, apply conditional logic, and enrich data at scale using a spreadsheet-like interface.

How Clay works:

Import a list of companies or contacts
Chain enrichment steps using integrations (Apollo, PeopleDataLabs, Clearbit, etc.)
Apply filters and conditional logic (e.g., "If Apollo returns no email, try PDL")
Use AI prompts to classify, score, or personalize data
Export enriched lists to CRM, Outreach, or other tools

Time investment: 30 minutes to 2 hours to build workflow, then 5-10 minutes per run
Accuracy: 75-85% (waterfall logic improves match rates)
Scalability: Can process thousands of records, but workflows break and need maintenance

Pros:

Flexibility: Unlimited custom workflows and integrations
Cost control: Pay only for the data providers you use
Transparency: See exactly which vendor provided each data point

Cons:

Technical complexity: Requires someone who understands APIs, webhooks, and data logic
Maintenance burden: Workflows break when APIs change or rate limits hit
Credit management: You're on the hook for managing spend across multiple vendors
No built-in CRM sync: Requires Zapier, webhooks, or CSV exports to get data into systems

When Clay makes sense:

Marketing Ops teams with technical resources (at least one person comfortable with APIs and data workflows)
Custom use cases that require chaining together 5+ different data sources
Volume-based pricing advantage (if you're enriching 10k+ records/month and can negotiate vendor discounts)

Common patterns we see:

Some teams use Clay to enrich website visitor leads for business emails before pushing to HubSpot
Others explore Clay for lead enrichment but find the setup too manual for their resources
Many want to remove Clay from their workflow entirely and push directly to CRM

The AI Agent Era (2024+)

Marketing Ops Agents (like Warmly's Tamly) use AI to automate the entire list-building process - from defining your ICP to finding buying committees to syncing results back to your CRM - without requiring you to build or maintain workflows.

How Marketing Ops Agents work:

Define your ICP using natural language prompts or CRM closed-won data
AI scores and filters your TAM based on ICP criteria
AI finds buying committees for each account (tailored by company size, industry, etc.)
Enrichment waterfall runs automatically across multiple vendors
Results sync back to HubSpot, Salesforce, or CSV in real-time

Time investment: 15 minutes to set up ICP and buying committee prompts, then fully automated
Accuracy: 80-90% (AI cross-references multiple sources and validates data)
Scalability: Can process 10k+ accounts simultaneously

Pros:

Zero maintenance: No workflows to fix, no API changes to monitor
Built-in intelligence: AI adapts buying committee size and roles based on company profile
One-click CRM sync: Data flows directly into HubSpot or Salesforce with proper field mapping
Prompt-based: Adjust ICP or personas using plain English instead of rebuilding workflows

Cons:

Less transparency: You don't see every individual enrichment step
Higher upfront cost: Typically $10k-$25k/year vs. Clay's pay-as-you-go model
Newer technology: Fewer third-party integrations than Clay's marketplace

When Marketing Ops Agents make sense:

Teams without dedicated MarOps engineers who need enrichment to "just work"
High-volume enrichment (1,000+ accounts/month) where manual work doesn't scale
Companies that value time-to-market over workflow customization
Orgs that want to consolidate tools (agent replaces ZoomInfo + Clay + manual research)

Common use cases:

Enterprise SaaS companies use Marketing Ops Agents to find net-new buying committee contacts in existing accounts to accelerate expansion
Security companies use the agent to enrich targeted account lists and see immediate value in buying committee identification
DevOps startups evaluate agents as a Clay alternative to reduce technical overhead

Side-by-Side Comparison Table

Detailed Pricing Breakdown (2026)

Manual Enrichment Costs

Tool	Annual Cost	What's Included
[ZoomInfo] (https://www.warmly.ai/p/blog/zoominfo-pricing)	$15k-$85k+	5-10 user seats, contact database, basic intent signals
[Apollo] (https://www.warmly.ai/p/blog/apollo-pricing)	$3k-$6k	5,000-10,000 credits/month, basic sequencing
LinkedIn Sales Navigator	$1k-$2k	50 InMails/month, lead recommendations

Hidden costs: Rep time (15+ hours/week at $50/hour = $37.5k/year labor)

Total cost of ownership: $50k-$125k/year

Source: Vendr transaction data, vendor pricing pages (January 2026)

Clay Pricing

Plan	Monthly Cost	Credits Included	Best For
Free	$0	100 credits	Testing workflows
Starter	$149	2,000 credits	Small teams
Explorer	$349	10,000 credits	Growing teams
Pro	$800	50,000 credits	High-volume ops

Plus data provider costs:

Apollo enrichments: $0.03-$0.10/contact
PeopleDataLabs: $0.02-$0.08/contact
Clearbit: $0.10-$0.50/contact

Hidden costs: Workflow maintenance labor (5+ hours/week at $75/hour = $18.75k/year)

Total cost of ownership: $25k-$50k/year (including labor)

Source: Clay pricing page, vendor API documentation (January 2026)

Marketing Ops Agent Pricing (Warmly Example)

Agent	Annual Cost	What's Included
AI Data Agent	From $10,100	Person-level de-anonymization, CRM integration, Coldly database
AI Inbound Agent	From $18,000	Intent-powered pop-ups, AI chatbot, live video chat, lead routing
AI Outbound Agent	From $24,000	Signal-based outbound orchestration, email + LinkedIn automation
Marketing Ops Agent	From $25,000	AI-powered account scoring, buying committee ID, real-time intent tracking

Hidden costs: Minimal (1 hour/week setup = $3.75k/year labor)

Total cost of ownership: $13k-$30k/year

Source: Warmly pricing, customer conversations (January 2026)

When to Use Each Approach

Choose Manual Enrichment If:

You have fewer than 5 BDRs and low monthly lead volume (<200 contacts/month)
You're doing hyper-targeted ABM where every account needs deep, custom research
Your industry has poor data coverage (e.g., non-profits, government, small local businesses)
You can't justify the cost of enrichment tools yet

Don't choose manual if: You're spending more than 10 hours/week on list building. Automation will pay for itself immediately.

Choose Clay If:

You have a dedicated Marketing Operations engineer who can build and maintain workflows
You need extreme customization—chaining together 5+ data providers with complex conditional logic
You're enriching 10k+ records/month and can negotiate volume discounts with data vendors
You want full transparency into which vendor provided each data point
You already use multiple enrichment tools (Apollo, PDL, Clearbit) and want to orchestrate them

Don't choose Clay if:

You don't have technical resources to build and maintain workflows
Your team changes ICP criteria frequently (rebuilding workflows is time-consuming)
You need seamless CRM sync without Zapier or webhook configuration

Migration tip: Many Warmly customers start with Clay and migrate to Marketing Ops Agents once they realize they're spending more time fixing workflows than building lists.

elated: Top 10 Data Enrichment Tools | Lead Enrichment Tools for GTM

Choose Marketing Ops Agent If:

You don't have a dedicated MarOps engineer and need enrichment to "just work"
You're enriching 1,000+ accounts/month and manual work doesn't scale
You want buying committee identification automated for each account
You need one-click CRM sync to HubSpot or Salesforce without middleware
You want to consolidate tools—replace ZoomInfo, Clay, and manual research with one platform
Your ICP changes frequently and you want to adjust via simple prompts instead of rebuilding workflows
You value time-to-market over workflow transparency

Don't choose an agent if:

You need extreme customization beyond ICP scoring and buying committee (e.g., scraping proprietary data sources)
You're uncomfortable with AI making enrichment decisions
You have less than $10k annual budget for enrichment

Migration tip: Most teams that switch from Clay to Marketing Ops Agents cite workflow maintenance burden and lack of seamless CRM sync as primary reasons.

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

Scenario: Mid-market B2B SaaS company, 5 BDRs, enriching 2,000 accounts/month

Manual Enrichment TCO
Cost Type Annual Amount
Software (ZoomInfo + Apollo) $13,000
Labor (15 hrs/week at $50/hr) $37,500
Total $50,500
Cost per enriched contact $2.10

Clay TCO

Cost Type	Annual Amount
Software (Clay Pro + data providers)	$8,000
Labor (5 hrs/week setup & maintenance at $75/hr)	$18,750
Total	$26,750
Cost per enriched contact	$1.11

Marketing Ops Agent TCO

Cost Type	Annual Amount
Software (all-in-one platform)	$15,000
Labor (1 hr/week minimal at $75/hr)	$3,750
Total	18,750
Cost per enriched contact	$0.78

Key takeaway: While agents have higher software costs, they deliver the lowest total cost of ownership when you factor in labor savings.

ROI Drivers by Approach

Migration Strategies

Moving from Manual to Clay

Step 1: Start with one high-value workflow (e.g., pricing page visitors to enriched contact list)

Step 2: Use Clay's templates to avoid building from scratch Step 3: Run Clay enrichment in parallel with manual for 2 weeks to validate accuracy
Step 4: Train 1-2 team members on Clay maintenance before fully switching

Step 5: Document workflows so they don't become "black boxes"
Timeline: 2-4 weeks

Common pitfalls:

Underestimating maintenance burden (workflows break when APIs change)
Not training backup team members (becomes single point of failure)
Over-engineering workflows when simpler logic would suffice

Moving from Clay to Marketing Ops Agent

Why customers migrate:

1. Workflow maintenance is eating too much time - "Every time Clay or a data provider updates their API, we have to rebuild workflows.

2. No seamless CRM sync - "We're using webhooks and Zapier as glue, and it breaks constantly"

3. Buying committee workflows are complex - "We want AI to figure out who the buying committee is based on company size, not maintain 10 different lookup tables"

Migration process:

Step 1: Identify which Clay workflows are repeatable vs. one-off experiments

Repeatable workflows (e.g., "enrich all website visitors") → Replace with agent
One-off experiments (e.g., "scrape GitHub stars for specific companies") → Keep Clay for edge cases

Step 2: Export your ICP criteria from Clay (filters, company size, industries, job titles)

Step 3: Set up Marketing Ops Agent with those ICP criteria using natural language prompts

Example prompt:

> "Our ICP is B2B SaaS companies with 50-500 employees, selling to IT/DevOps, with Series A-C funding. Buying committee includes VP Engineering, Director of DevOps, IT Manager.

Step 4: Run agent on a test list of 100 companies and compare results to Clay

Step 5: Configure native CRM sync (HubSpot or Salesforce) to replace Zapier/webhooks

Step 6: Gradually sunset Clay workflows as agent proves accuracy

Timeline: 1-2 weeks (parallel run + validation

Cost implication: May increase software spend by $5k-$10k/year but save $15k-$25k/year in labor

> "We were spending 10+ hours/week maintaining Clay workflows. Warmly's agent does the same thing with zero maintenance, and the CRM sync is native-no more Zapier breakage." - Marketing Ops Manage

Moving from Manual to Marketing Ops Agent (Skipping Clay)

When to skip Clay entirely:

You don't have technical resources to build/maintain workflows
You need results fast (weeks, not months)
Your use case is standard (ICP scoring + buying committee)

Migration process:

Step 1: Pull a list of your last 50 closed-won deals from your CRM
Step 2: Analyze common attributes (company size, industry, job titles, tech stack)
Step 3: Use those patterns to build your ICP prompt for the agent

Example prompt:

> "Analyze my closed-won deals and identify the ICP tier (Tier 1 = best fit). Then find buying committees for each account.

Step 4: Let the agent enrich your TAM (total addressable market) list

Step 5: Sync results to CRM and launch targeted campaigns

Timeline: 1 week

Cost implication: Replace $10k-$15k/year in manual tools + labor with $10k-$25k all-in agent

Use Case Examples

Use Case 1: High-Intent Website Visitor Enrichment

Challenge: Your website gets 5,000 visitors/month. You identify 30% at the company level but only 10% at the person level. You need contact details to trigger outbound sequences.

‎Winner: Agent (fastest time-to-value, highest accuracy, zero maintenance)

Use Case 2: Building Targeted Account Lists for ABM

Challenge: You have a list of 5,000 target accounts. You need to find 3-5 buying committee members per account and score each account by ICP fit.

‎Winner: Agent (10x faster, higher contact coverage, dynamic buying committee sizing)

Use Case 3: Closed-Lost Account Re-Engagement

Challenge: You have 2,000 closed-lost opportunities from the past 2 years. You want to re-engage them with updated buying committees (since contacts have likely changed jobs).

‎Winner: Agent (60x faster than manual, auto-detects job changes)

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use a Marketing Ops Agent alongside Clay?

Yes. Many teams use agents for repeatable, high-volume workflows (e.g., enriching all website visitors, building buying committees) and reserve Clay for custom, one-off projects (e.g., scraping niche data sources, experimental workflows).

Example workflow:

Agent: Enriches all inbound leads and syncs to CRM automatically
Clay: Handles custom data scraping (e.g., pulling GitHub stars, Crunchbase funding data, etc.) for specific campaigns

This hybrid approach gives you the best of both worlds - automation for 80% of use cases and flexibility for the remaining 20%.

How much does a Marketing Ops Agent cost compared to Clay?

Clay: $149-$800/month (depending on plan) + data provider costs ($0.02-$0.50 per enrichment)

→ Total: $3k-$15k/year (depending on volume)

Marketing Ops Agent (e.g., Warmly): $10k-$25k/year all-in (includes enrichment credits)

→ Total: $10k-$25k/year

Key difference: Agent pricing is all-inclusive (no surprise data provider bills), while Clay is pay-as-you-go (costs can spike if workflows aren't optimized).

Break-even analysis: If you're enriching more than 1,000 contacts/month, agent pricing often becomes cheaper than Clay + data providers when you factor in labor savings.

Will I lose flexibility if I switch from Clay to an agent?

Partially, yes. Clay's strength is unlimited customization -you can chain together any data source and build any logic you want. Agents sacrifice some customization in exchange for zero maintenance and faster time-to-value.

What you lose:

Ability to build highly custom workflows (e.g., "If Apollo fails, try PDL, then try manual scraping")
Full transparency into every enrichment step
Integration with niche data providers not supported by the agent

What you gain:

Zero workflow maintenance (agent adapts automatically)
Native CRM sync (no Zapier or webhooks required)
AI-powered ICP scoring and buying committee logic

Bottom line: If 80% of your enrichment needs are standard (ICP scoring, buying committee, contact enrichment), an agent will save you 10+ hours/week. Reserve Clay for the 20% of edge cases that require custom logic.

Can an agent replace ZoomInfo or Apollo?

For contact enrichment: Yes (mostly).

Marketing Ops Agents use enrichment waterfalls that pull from multiple vendors (similar to how Clay works). In many cases, the agent's data coverage matches or exceeds ZoomInfo alone because it cross-references multiple sources.

For prospecting cold lists: Not entirely.

If you need to build a net-new list of companies from scratch (e.g., "Find all Series A SaaS companies in fintech"), you'll still need a prospecting database like ZoomInfo, Apollo, or LeadIQ. However, once you have that list, the agent can enrich it faster and cheaper than manually clicking through ZoomInfo.

"We still use ZoomInfo to build our initial target account lists, but Warmly's agent does all the contact enrichment and buying committee mapping. We're saving $30k/year by not needing as many ZoomInfo seats." - Head of Sales Operation

What's the difference between Clay and a Marketing Ops Agent?

Dimension	Clay	Marketing Ops Agent
Setup	Build workflows from scratch	Configure via natural language prompts
Maintenance	Ongoing (APIs break, logic changes)	None (AI adapts)
Skill required	Medium-High (APIs, webhooks)	Low (plain English)
CRM sync	Manual (Zapier, webhooks)	Native (one-click)
Pricing model	Pay-as-you-go	All-inclusive
Customization	Unlimited	Standard use cases
Best for	Technical teams with unique workflows	Teams that want enrichment to "just work"

How do I know if my team is ready for a Marketing Ops Agent?

You're ready if:

You're enriching 500+ contacts/month (agents deliver ROI at scale)
Your team lacks dedicated MarOps engineering resources (agents require no technical setup)
You're frustrated with workflow maintenance in Clay (agents require zero maintenance)
You need buying committee identification automated for each account
You want native CRM sync without Zapier or webhooks

You're NOT ready if:

You're enriching fewer than 200 contacts/month (manual or Clay may be cheaper)
You need extreme customization beyond ICP scoring + buying committees (Clay is more flexible)
Your ICP changes weekly and you prefer manual control over AI suggestions

Migration readiness checklist:

Document your current enrichment process (time spent, accuracy, pain points)
Calculate total cost of ownership (software + labor)
Identify which workflows are repeatable vs. one-off experiments
Run a pilot with 100-500 accounts to validate agent accuracy
Compare results side-by-side with your current approach

Which enrichment approach is best for SMBs?

For SMBs (<50 employees, <$10M ARR): Marketing Ops Agents often provide the best ROI because:

No dedicated MarOps engineer required - SMBs rarely have technical resources for Clay workflows
Faster time-to-value - Set up in 15 minutes vs. days of workflow building
Predictable costs - All-inclusive pricing vs. variable data provider bills
Scales with growth - Same setup handles 100 or 10,000 accounts

Clay makes sense for SMBs only if you have a technical co-founder or ops lead who enjoys building and maintaining data workflows.

Related: Warmly vs Clearbit | 6sense Alternatives

What's the best Clay alternative for automated enrichment?

If you're looking for a Clay alternative specifically for automated enrichment without workflow maintenance, Marketing Ops Agents are the primary category to consider. Key alternatives include:

Warmly Marketing Ops Agent - Best for teams that want zero-maintenance enrichment with native CRM sync
6sense - Best for enterprise ABM with robust intent data (expensive)
Clearbit - Best for HubSpot users needing basic enrichment
Apollo - Best for budget-conscious teams with sequencing needs

Related: Top 10 Data Enrichment Tools

Choosing Your Enrichment Path: Summary

The right enrichment approach depends on your team size, technical resources, and growth goals. Here's the decision framework:

Choose Manual Enrichment If:

You have fewer than 5 BDRs and low monthly volume (<200 contacts/month)
You're doing hyper-targeted ABM where every account needs custom research
You can't justify the cost of automation tools yet

Choose Clay If:

You have a dedicated Marketing Operations engineer
You need extreme customization (5+ data sources, complex conditional logic)
You're enriching 10k+ records/month and can negotiate volume discounts
You want full transparency into enrichment sources

Choose Marketing Ops Agent If:

You don't have technical resources to build/maintain workflows
You're enriching 1,000+ accounts/month and manual work doesn't scale
You want buying committee identification automated
You need one-click CRM sync without middleware
You value time-to-market over workflow customization
You want to consolidate tools (replace ZoomInfo + Clay + manual research)

The Future: Hybrid Intelligence

The future of marketing operations isn't manual vs. Clay vs. agent - it's using all three strategically:

Agents handle repeatable, high-volume workflows (80% of enrichment)
Clay handles custom, one-off experiments (15% of edge cases)
Manual handles ultra-high-value accounts that need deep research (5% of strategic ABM)

The companies winning today match the right tool to the right use case instead of forcing one approach for everything.

Ready to see how a Marketing Ops Agent compares to your current workflow? Run a side-by-side pilot on your next 100 target accounts and measure time-to-enrichment, accuracy, and total cost. The data will tell you which path is right for your team.

Cost Type	Annual Amount
Software (ZoomInfo + Apollo)	$13,000
Labor (15 hrs/week at $50/hr)	$37,500
Total	$50,500
Cost per enriched contact	$2.10

Connect with Our Experts